The Law of Unintended Consequences: The Case of Proxy Advisory Firms - forbes.com -BoardProspects

The Law of Unintended Consequences: The Case of Proxy Advisory Firms

forbes.com Nov 15 2018 BoardBlogs

The SEC requirement that institutional investors vote on all proxy statements has led to adverse outcomes. Rule changes that strengthen conflict of interest disclosures and relax institutional investors requirements to vote on all proxy statements would help reduce these costs...
Read Full Article

Bookmark or Share this article

Login to comment.
Related Articles
- Is Your Board Meeting Location a Distraction? by Susan Hammond also categorized in BoardBlogs
- IFC Supports OJK in Improving Corporate Governance in Indonesia also mentions Conference
- Getting Gen-Y on Boards (of Directors) also published in forbes.com
- Nonprofit Governance: Why It Matters to Attend Board Meetings By Susan Hammond also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Six Years Later, The Problem at HP is Still the Board also published in forbes.com
- The 70:20:10 Rule of Board Learning by Debra Beck also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Are You Ready for an Advisory Board? Twelve Questions to Help You Decide By: Susan Hammond also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Responsibilities of a Nonprofit Board by Maria Peeler also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Who’s in charge here? By: Charles Whipple also categorized in BoardBlogs
- Six Reasons To Consider Establishing An Advisory Board By: Susan Hammond also categorized in BoardBlogs

Search:
Categories
1. BoardProspects Features:
  BoardBlogs, BoardKnowledge, BoardMoves, BoardNews, BoardProspects Announcements, BoardProspects CEO, CEO Blog, In the News, Partner Publications, Sponsored Content
Topics Mentioned
- Management
- Investors
- risk
- California
- Conference
- ISS
- ESG
- Glass Lewis
- SEC
- CalSTRS
- Calpers
- Conflict of Interest
- SEC Commissioner
- Proxy Advisory
- Investment
- crisis
- social issues
Authors
- Wayne Winegarden, Contributor
- Wayne Winegarden